December 2008
S M T W T F S
« Feb    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Example

Search

RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Show Some Love

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Technorati Favorites

Bush Analyzed as Crazy

July 27th, 2007 by Joe Hack

The wonderful Bill Maher rips into Georgey boy and hilariously questions the sanity of the Prez and those deluded enough to still support him. The truly scary thing is that this is just TV satire, but most of us now believe that the guy with his finger on the big red shiny nuclear button actually *is* a few bricks short of a full load.


-Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in Political Rants | 3 Comments »

George Galloway - Anti-War Hero

July 19th, 2007 by Joe Hack

Well at last a British or American politician has been censured over the bloody fiasco of the Iraq war. Wait a minute though. Its George Galloway, the UK Respect party MP who’s been one of the wars greatest critics and a constant thorn in the side of the Blair/Bush adminisrations. Hmmmm. Lets consider this. On the one hand we have Bush and Blair who are jointly responsible for lying to their respective countries, the death of over 600,000 iraqui civilians, turning a further 4.2 million into refugees, de-stabilising the middle east and making the word a far more dangerous place. They have escaped all official censure and in fact Blair has just been rewarded by being given the job of (you have to laugh) peace envoy to the middle east. On the other hand we have George Galloway, the maverick British MP who before the illegal invasion warned very graphically of its likely consequences and since then has led resistance in the UK to Blairs war. How strange. So far Gallloway is the only politician in the UK or the USA to be officially censured for his actions. Not Bush. Not Blair. Not a single one of the craven MPs or congressmen or Senators who looked the other way and supported the lies about WMD . I don’t think many ordinary people in the street are going to understand that. Do you ?


Very briefly indeed, George Galloway was a politician who knew about Iraq and had connections with it. He helped set up the Mariam appeal to help sick Iraqi children and campaigned against the allied sanctions which were killing thousands of them each year. That was essentially humanitarian and would have attracted very little interest had Galloway not committed the unforgivable sin of criticising the Bush/Blair invasion of Iraq and then carried on criticizing the ‘war’, providing a focal point for growing public unrest. Over the years since 2003 his anti-war stance has provoked vicious retaliation from the establishment. He has had to contend with what most people suspect have been dirty tricks run by the spooks (the ‘dodgey’ documents miraculously ‘found’ in Bhagdad), libellous comments from pro-war newsmedia (one of which he famously took to court and forced to apologise) and the notorious occassion when he voluntarily appeared before a US Senate committee chaired by the hapless republican senator Norm Coleman where the same tired slanders were repeated . They were expecting a polite ‘British’ politician who would tamely accept the hatchet job they intended delivering. They got a mean Scottish pit-bull instead. On prime-time TV and in front of millions around the world George absolutely wiped the floor with the shell-shocked Norm and his committee. He told them contemptuously to put up or shut up. They shut up. He was also kicked out of Blairs ‘New Labour’ party and immediately founded his own Respect party and beat the official labour candidate hands-down in an election. How George Galloway has survived the last few years is hard to imagine. Every dirty trick and smear that could have been used against him has been. He must be a very tough and determined man. Others have been killed or driven out of their jobs by the same treatment.

The latest episode in this long-running and shameful saga is that this week the obscure UK House of Commons standards committee has officially censured Galloway. In a voluminous report into his behaviour they have pawed over the same old ground again with as little success. They have been forced to accept that he has never personally profited by one penny from any of his activities in relation to Iraq. Reading between the lines, he has receieved a rap over the knuckles for the rumbustious way he has defended himself and fought back against the dirty tricks and slanders. Essentially the censure seems to rest on a technicality. He was criticised for not personally going into the financial background of every donor to the sick-child charity and the provenance of any donation they wished to make. Clearly that is a standard not required of anyone else in the country associated with a charity and one certainly not operated by the Labour government which is currently embroiled in a scandal over selling political honours for cash. If thats really all the establishment can come up with after all these years of trying, after crawling over every aspect of his life and finances, after trying to make his life a living hell, then its really … well its just pretty sad and pathetic, isn’t it ?

In the press this week you will no doubt read the usual hatchet jobs on George Galloway, the smears and the innuendo that have been part of his life for the last few years. But you need some balance. An opposing view. Surely thats what freedom and democracy is really about. None of us has the gift of total knowledge, but as far as any of us can tell and going purely on the evidence George Galloway is an honest man who has been persecuted for his opposition to the Iraq war. George Galloway has not said anything about the war, or about Bush or Blair, that is untrue as far as I know. Bush and Blair, on the other hand, demonstrably misled their countries with false and manipulated evidence with all of the tragic consequences we have seen. If the public had to believe just one of those three, I’m pretty sure I know which one most people in both the UK and the USA would trust. And the surname wouldn’t begin with a B.

-Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in Political Rants | No Comments »

Bush Gets Surge Sickness!

July 11th, 2007 by Joe Hack

Poor old . He’s suffering from ’surge sickness’ and it might just be terminal. One of its worst syptoms is a resolute refusal to face reality. In a today in Ohio he attempted once again to wave the flag for his failing ’surge’ strategy in . As an aside, does anyone else find the idea of actually having a ’strategy’ kinda funny ?

Anyway, he’s asking for ‘patience’ from and the American people as the bloody civil war in Iraq continues unabated despite the fact that General David Petraeus is expected to report negatively in his July ’snap-shot’ report on the so-called ’surge’ in troop deployment that was Bushs desperate last throw of the dice. The ’surge’ as you will recall, was the piece of inspired ‘Alice-in’Wonderland’ thinking that sent an additional 30,000 to Iraq to fight an unwinnable war. American casualties continue to mount, the civilian death-toll is horrendous, and the body-bags just keep on coming home (although as we know there has been continuing pressure on the TV companies not to show images of these on TV ).


Times have changed though. No-one seems to be listening to Georgey-boy any more. Calls for a withdrawal to begin immediately are growing in Washington, with four Republican senators last week adding their voice to those demanding a new plan and this week will see a contentious debate in the US Senate over a major defence spending bill. In fact, the rise in pressure within Congress and among the US public is so great that one official speaking to the Washington Post newspaper said that “July has become the new September”. Independent news commentators say that the president’s call for a truce in the cannot mask the sharply growing sense of urgency in the White House over the need to stem the flow of Republican defections on Iraq. Vice-President ‘Deadeye’ Dick Cheney and other senior administration officials have been scurrying about in Congress during the day urging senators to remain loyal. Even before Mr Bush’s ‘more of the same’ speech White House aides were playing down the July report, calling it a “snapshot” and emphasising that not too much should be expected just yet.

On Monday, speaking to the BBC, Gen Petraeus also called for patience, warning that fighting the is a “long term endeavour” which could take decades. Eh? Say that again slowly, buddy. Decades ? So is the guy on the ground now saying that American troops are going to be sacrificed in this bitter carnage for ‘decades’ to come ? Not just your children, but your childrens children ? Well that sounds like a great strategy that the people will be rushing to get behind, doesn’t it ?

Fact is, its all about arrogance. Bushs arrogance and dumb inability to admit he got it so horribly wrong. He invaded Iraq on the basis of for reasons that were more to do with oil and Isaeli pressure than anything else. There was no WMD. There was no link whatsoever between Iraq and Al Quaeda (although thanks to George W its a playground now). Bushs illegal war has cost over 600,000 Iraqi lives and made another 4 million of them into refugees. American military deaths and serious injuries in Iraq continue to escalate. The country is descending into bloody civil war and the whole of the middle-east has been destabilised. Because of the and other torture scandals,  ‘extraordinary rendition’, and , Americas reputation as a civilized  country has been dragged through the mud internationally and the US is divided internally like never before. Thats the sum total of Bushs great Iraq strategy so far.

And his solution to the chaos ? You guessed it. No change. More of the same.

You really couldn’t make stuff like this up, could you ?Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in Political Rants | 3 Comments »